Asia
Law In House Counsel Awards
Who are the best in-house counsel in Asia? Extensive market
polls and independent market research were used o determine
who would win he inaugural Asialaw In-house Counsel Awards.
Sam Baillie reports on the in-house Counsel selected by law
firms as the best in the region.
How the fortunes of Asia's in-house counsel has changed. Yesterday
they were a forgotten minority stuck in the back-office. Today,
at the pinnacle of their profession, in-house counsel are
guiding the world's largest companies through the minefield
that is legal compliance in the modern economy.
Such an elevation in status has not come about just because
of the mounting regulatory weight on the shoulders of the
region's companies. In-house counsel are now recognized as
much for their legal prowess as for their business acumen.
In fact, more often than not, they can be found today not
in the back office trawling through the latest Shareholder
Corporate Governance Guide, but in the boardroom as members
of the senior management team making critical day-to-day decisions.
With in-house counsel now at the centre of the evolution
of Asia’s business landscape, Asialaw believes it high
time that they receive a little kudos for their efforts. After
extensive market polls and independent market research, in
April, Asialaw released a shortlist of the top three in-house
counsel in 13 jurisdictions in the Asia-Pacific and the top
five in the region as a whole (See boxes: In-house Counsel
Awards Shortlist). Following several months of further research,
Asialaw is pleased to disclose the winners of the Asialaw
In-house Counsel Awards.
Drum-roll please . . .
A quick look at the table of winners and it is clear that
Asia’s leading in-house counsel have penetrated most
sectors of the economy. From the oil industry to the semiconductor
industry and from banking and finance to food and beverage,
today’s leading in-house counsel represent a cross-section
of talent that one would be hard-pressed to find in most leading
law firms. This is especially so considering the frontline
experience many have gained in running businesses - something
that one would expect to be the domain of senior partners
at large law firms.
But it is in an industry that is almost synonymous with the
word ’compliance’ where there have been the most
nominations. Indeed, in-house counsel at various banks throughout
the region managed to capture 38 of the 224 nominations in
total. This predilection is also evident on the winners’
list, where three of the 14 awards went to those in banking.
They include the standout performer of Asialaw's In-house
Counsel Awards, Jonathan Ross of Bank of China (Hong Kong)
(BOC), who takes the trophy for both the Asia - Pacific and
Hong Kong.
As the only non-Chinese employee of the bank, Ross commands
an enviable level of respect from his peers in private practice.
Ross was foremost in organizing the institution’s US$2.8
billion listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange in July 2002.
More recently, he played a central role in developing BOC's
renminbi business. ”Ross is a sharp and experienced
in-house lawyer that possesses a combined strength of superb
legal expertise and a practical commercial sense,” says
Shearman & Sterling partner Leiming Chen. He commends
Ross for his ability to ”identify critical legal issues”
and ”analyze their impact on commercial aspects,,”
as well as ”proposing practical solutions to manage
legal risks” . In these matters, Chen feels Ross is
”second to none”.
Ross’ success has depended largely on his Mandarin
language skills and his ability to delegate and manage BOC's
hefty legal workload with outside counsel. ”Blending
his legal skills with language ability, Ross is playing a
significant role in the development of the legal and compliance
functions of BOC,” says David Kidd, a partner at Allen
& Overy.
His capacity to ”speak Putonghua and read Chinese is
definitely a plus in completing assignments in a cost and
time-effective manner,” agrees DLA Piper Rudnick Gray
Cary partner Fung King Tak. He adds that this efficiency is
furthered by Ross’ ”excellent control over the
costs and quality of work produced by external counsel for
the bank”.
In addition to his good name among many private practices
in Hong Kong, Ross is well regarded among fellow colleagues
within the in-house niche. This has come about not only through
his good work, but also through his core role in establishing
the Hong Kong Corporate Counsel Association (HKCCA). ”Ross’
important role in establishing an organization for foreign
in-house lawyers in Hong Kong to meet and share views and
meet outside speakers has been effective in his internal and
external representation of the bank.” notes Freshfields
partner Thomas Jones.
Says Ross on receiving the Asialaw In-house Counsel Award
for Hong Kong and the Lovells Award for the Asia - Pacific:
”It is my pleasure and privilege to receive these awards.
I hope that this is an appreciation of the work I have done
over the last two years for the Hong Kong Corporate Counsel
Association and on behalf of corporate counsel in Hong Kong
in general. Seeing the HKCCA take off and become a viable
and effective association has been reward enough in itself,
but this award is further confirmation of the value of the
HKCCA. Thank you Asialaw for sponsoring the awards and for
contributing to the increased stature of the in-house legal
community in Asia.”
Success through adversity
Whilst in-house counsel are crucial in formulating the growth
of companies, their core role of course concerns the resolution
of problems that arise when conducting business. None of the
companies on the winners’ list are unique in their ability
to avoid legal disputes. In many respects, this is as much
of a reflection of their size and success as it is the growing
litigious and regulative nature of most jurisdictions in the
region.
Similarly, those that rise to the top in the legal in-house
counsel world do so through a kind of oxymoron: they cannot
be successful unless they work for a company that is regularly
legally challenged, something that if it goes badly is considered
mildly unsuccessful at best. As they say: you are remembered
for your wins and not your losses.
Consider Australia’s number one voted in-house counsel
David Krasnostein of National Australia Bank (NAB). As Australia’s
largest bank, one cannot doubt NAB's credentials as a top-notch
lender. But at the same time, it has been beset with one of
Australia's largest institutional crises of late - and that
is saying something.
When in January 2004 it was revealed that four of NAB’s
foreign exchange traders had squandered A$360 million (approximately
US$274 .6 million) in unauthorized trades speculating on the
market, you can bet Krasnostein was one of the first to know.
The scandal has served as a significant impetus in the overhaul
of NAB's internal compliance, risk management and governance
systems - a process in which Krasnostein has been centrally
involved in.
Commenting on Krasnostein’s work under pressure, Mallesons
Stephen Jaques partner Nuncio D’Angelo makes known his
reputation for ”commercially focused advice to the top
level of the bank,” something that came to the fore
he says in 2003 when ”the bank and its board faced extreme
circumstances“.. Having worked under him and on secondment,
D’Angelo has witnessed Krasnostein's ”outstanding
management of the in-house team and strong but fair management
of external providers”.
Pressure pushes peak performers
The NAB case portrays well the kind of high-growth and high-risk
environment in which top in-house counsel excel. Asia is almost
synonymous with such an environment and serves as a virtual
breeding-ground for some of the world’s finest in-house
counsel.
A majority of the in-house counsel on the winners' list work
in the high-technology manufacturing sector. Manufacturers
operating at the upper end of the value chain face a host
of legal challenges - especially in Asia. Not least is this
because of the high incidence of patent infringements they
face on their valuable technologies.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) recently
resolved a near 18-month long dispute with the Shanghai-based
Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC),
which it accused of multiple patent infringements and misappropriated
trade secrets. The latter recently agreed to pay TSMC US$175
million to settle lawsuits filed in California and Taiwan
and a complaint filed with the International Trade Commission.
The deputy director of TSMC's corporate legal division and
its board secretary, Sylvia Fang, has been acclaimed for her
legal work with the company and takes the 2005 Deep &
Far Award for Taiwan In-house Counsel. Having worked with
TSMC for 10 years, Fang has built an impressive portfolio
of work that covers various disciplines, including IP. With
six years experience in an IP firm prior to joining, she is
especially adept in handling IP cross-licensing negotiations.
Perhaps her greatest claim to fame, however, came in 2001
when she led a number of Taiwanese semiconductor companies
in fighting a US anti-dumping petition. After four years of
work, the Taiwan industry group eventually won the case and
retrieved considerable cash deposits by importers that were
being held by the US Customs Service.
As one of TSMC's most active outside counsel, Sherry Lin
from Lee & Li is full of praise for Fang, noting her "great
command" in her field and ability to "correspond
efficiently with outside counsel when seeking independent
opinions". Likewise, Lin's colleague, Alex Jui-Lin Liu,
comments that Fang is not only "articulate in her requests
for legal services," but "allows reasonably sufficient
time for outside counsels to respond". She also illustrates
"efficient communication and the effective use of outside
counsels, [achieving] a win-win benefit for both the company
and outside counsel”.
Still a niche area
Though in-house counsel have grown in prominence in Asia,
especially since the 1997-98 financial crisis, they remain
very much a minority. Indeed there are several jurisdictions
in which they are almost unheard of In Vietnam, for example,
several of the lawyers that we spoke to struggled to name
a single in-house counsel in the country - even at the big
multinationals. In spite of this, more and more lawyers are
choosing to become in-house counsel in Vietnam, with those
currently practicing in the area held in very high regard.
Le Dinh Buu Tri is one such individual and, having worked
as Manulife Vietnam's in-house legal counsel since 2001, is
considered almost a veteran of the industry. As corporate
secretary, Tri is responsible for a wide range of compliance
and legal matters. He also manages Manulife Vietnam's external
legal relationships. Tri provides legal advice directly to
the company's senior management, including on corporate strategy
and the drafting/reviewing of all standard forms, contracts
and letters.
Similar to Vietnam, in-house counsel are somewhat of a rare
breed in Japan and South Korea. In Japan, for example, it
is still unusual for Japanese companies to have qualified
lawyers on their internal staff. ”Those few who are
qualified lawyers,” says one lawyer, ”are not
particularly well regarded”. Hence, it is mostly the
foreign companies that are active in Japan which tend to have
full-time legal staff on their payrolls. As the winner of
the 2005 Anderson Mori & Tomotsune
Award for Japan In-house Counsel, Laurence Bates of General
Electric (Japan) is regarded as "the pre-eminent foreign
in-house lawyer in Japan,” according to one partner
at a prominent US firm. ”He is widely respected not
only for his own lawyering skills, but also for his creation
of legal functions for numerous GE businesses, which in many
cases include a carefully integrated team of foreign lawyers,
Japanese lawyers and legal specialists”. Until recently,
Bates co -chaired the American Chamber's Corporate Counsel
subcommittee, in the capacity of which he ”tirelessly
supported structural reform in many segments
of the Japanese economy.”
Like its neighbour Japan, one needs to look no further than
the multinationals or large domestic conglomerates to find
an in-house counsel in South Korea.
Indeed, the poll winner from South Korea comes from one of the
country’s larger chaebols, or domestic conglomerates.
Having been with LG Corporation for over 10 years, Sang-Hun
Kim ”has provided the company with great legal skill and
professionalism," says Shin & Shin senior partner woong
Shik Shin, He also has “a superb reputation of working
well with outside counsel” and has played a “pivotal
role as a pioneer in guiding Korean companies to effectively
use their in-house counsel.”
~ asialaw ~
Methodology
The objective of the poll was to identify Asia's leading
in-house counsel. In order to do this, private practice
practitioners throughout the region were asked to nominate
the top three in-house counsel in their jurisdiction,
and the top three in-house counsel in the Asia-Pacific
region as a whole.. A total of 261 votes [responses]
were received.
In house-counsel were ranked according
to points gained through the nominations. This was a
simple process of awarding one point for each nomination
gained. The shortlist published in the April 2005 issue
of Asialaw comprised the top three in-house counsel
in each jurisdiction and the Asia-Pacific as a whole,
according to points awarded.
The shortlist served as a base for
further research into each in-house counsel. The overall
winners were determined through a combination of editorial
research - concentrating on deals/cases worked on -
and the points awarded through the nominations.
|
|